Sidhauli
Assembly constituency 61 (SC) · Uttar Pradesh
[01]Result · 2002
#61 · SCAll candidates 11
- 01 Shyam Lal RawatSP46,771 34.3%
- 02 Ramesh RahiBSP46,335 33.9%
- 03 Ram Karan RawatBJP24,942 18.3%
- 04 Manish Kumar VermaINC9,277 6.8%
- 05 Ram VilashIND2,162 1.6%
- 06 Ram BakhshRKP2,119 1.6%
- 07 GajodharIND1,765 1.3%
- 08 Ram AsreyIND962 0.7%
- 09 Rajendra Kumar IndrasanRJD886 0.7%
- 10 RameshIND724 0.5%
- 11 Udaipal BhartiyaIND593 0.4%
Turnout 59.3%
Share of 2,30,316 electors
- Sex ratiofemales per 1,000 males818
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- State median turnoutmedian of 403 seats, 200255.8%
- ReconciliationΣ 11 candidates = 1,36,536Verified
Seat history 2002–2022
- 2002
0.3 ppShyam Lal RawatSamajwadi Party
- 2007
9.2 ppDr. Hargovind BhargavaBahujan Samaj Party
- 2012
13.2 ppMahesh Kumar SharmaBharatiya Janata Party
- 2017
41.2 ppPankaj SinghBharatiya Janata Party
- 2022
52.5 ppPankaj SinghBharatiya Janata Party
Winning margin in percentage points; bars scaled to the widest, 52.5 pp.
[02]Computed insights
Arithmetic · working shown-
Third-placed BJP polled 24,942 votes, 57× the 436-vote margin.
24,942 ÷ 436 = 57.2 -
The top two polled 68.2% of votes; the other 9 candidates 31.8% between them.
(46,771 + 46,335) ÷ 1,36,536 = 68.2% · 43,430 ÷ 1,36,536 = 31.8% -
Turnout of 59.3% was 3.5 pp above the state's median seat (55.8%).
59.3 − 55.8 = +3.5
Each line is arithmetic over the figures on this page.
[03]Reconciliation
Verified- Candidate votesΣ 11 candidate lines1,36,536
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- Published totalVotes polled1,36,536
- Checkcandidates = total, NOTA outside itHolds
Candidate votes equal the published total. NOTA is reported alongside it.
Contest resultElection Commission of India, constituency-wise results · Vidhan Sabha 2002 · Uttar Pradesh · retrieval date not recorded in the results database
Candidates11 candidate lines from the same results · reconciliation: Verified
State median turnoutComputed from 403 seats on the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha 2002 board · retrieval date not recorded in the results database