Pilibhit
Assembly constituency 41 (GEN) · Uttar Pradesh
[01]Result · 2002
#41 · GENAll candidates 13
- 01 Riaz AhmadSP35,700 29.0%
- 02 B.K. GuptaBJP25,729 20.9%
- 03 Raj Rai SinghINC17,805 14.5%
- 04 Girja ShankerRKP13,414 10.9%
- 05 Sayyed Mohd. ZakiBSP7,941 6.5%
- 06 Budh SenSD6,994 5.7%
- 07 Prabhat JaiswalIND6,075 4.9%
- 08 Haroon AhmadSJP3,003 2.4%
- 09 Mahavir SinghIND2,534 2.1%
- 10 Kundan LalIND1,881 1.5%
- 11 Amjad HussainINLD1,135 0.9%
- 12 Nanak ChandIND418 0.3%
- 13 Ajai JaiswalIND352 0.3%
Turnout 57.8%
Share of 2,12,867 electors
- Sex ratiofemales per 1,000 males867
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- State median turnoutmedian of 403 seats, 200255.8%
- ReconciliationΣ 13 candidates = 1,22,981Verified
Seat history 2002–2022
- 2002
8.1 ppRiaz AhmadSamajwadi Party
- 2007
3.0 ppRiaz AhmadSamajwadi Party
- 2012
12.3 ppMehboob AliSamajwadi Party
- 2017
7.5 ppMehboob AliSamajwadi Party
- 2022
31.8 ppMehboob AliSamajwadi Party
Winning margin in percentage points; bars scaled to the widest, 31.8 pp.
[02]Computed insights
Arithmetic · working shown-
Third-placed INC polled 17,805 votes, 1.8× the 9,971-vote margin.
17,805 ÷ 9,971 = 1.8 -
The top two polled 49.9% of votes; the other 11 candidates 50.1% between them.
(35,700 + 25,729) ÷ 1,22,981 = 49.9% · 61,552 ÷ 1,22,981 = 50.1% -
Turnout of 57.8% was 2.0 pp above the state's median seat (55.8%).
57.8 − 55.8 = +2.0
Each line is arithmetic over the figures on this page.
[03]Reconciliation
Verified- Candidate votesΣ 13 candidate lines1,22,981
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- Published totalVotes polled1,22,981
- Checkcandidates = total, NOTA outside itHolds
Candidate votes equal the published total. NOTA is reported alongside it.
Contest resultElection Commission of India, constituency-wise results · Vidhan Sabha 2002 · Uttar Pradesh · retrieval date not recorded in the results database
Candidates13 candidate lines from the same results · reconciliation: Verified
State median turnoutComputed from 403 seats on the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha 2002 board · retrieval date not recorded in the results database