Chandauli
Assembly constituency 222 (SC) · Uttar Pradesh
[01]Result · 2002
#222 · SCAll candidates 11
- 01 Sharda PrasadBSP45,706 31.3%
- 02 Ujagir GondSP40,232 27.6%
- 03 Chhannu Lal ShastriBJP37,223 25.5%
- 04 Rajesh Kumar ChaudharyINC7,874 5.4%
- 05 Ram DhawalIND5,929 4.1%
- 06 SuraliRKP2,749 1.9%
- 07 Surya NathCPI(ML)L1,914 1.3%
- 08 LaljiIND1,573 1.1%
- 09 AmbikaRPI1,421 1.0%
- 10 GangasagarIND772 0.5%
- 11 Shyam LalAD537 0.4%
Turnout 52.4%
Share of 2,78,279 electors
- Sex ratiofemales per 1,000 males854
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- State median turnoutmedian of 403 seats, 200255.8%
- ReconciliationΣ 11 candidates = 1,45,930Verified
Seat history 2002–2022
- 2002
3.8 ppSharda PrasadBahujan Samaj Party
- 2007
6.7 ppSharda PrasadBahujan Samaj Party
- 2012
3.5 ppKrishna Pal Singh RajpootBahujan Samaj Party
- 2017
7.4 ppRajeev Singh "parichha"Bharatiya Janata Party
- 2022
19.1 ppRajeev Singh ''parichha''Bharatiya Janata Party
Winning margin in percentage points; bars scaled to the widest, 19.1 pp.
[02]Computed insights
Arithmetic · working shown-
Third-placed BJP polled 37,223 votes, 6.8× the 5,474-vote margin.
37,223 ÷ 5,474 = 6.8 -
The top two polled 58.9% of votes; the other 9 candidates 41.1% between them.
(45,706 + 40,232) ÷ 1,45,930 = 58.9% · 59,992 ÷ 1,45,930 = 41.1% -
Turnout of 52.4% was 3.4 pp below the state's median seat (55.8%).
52.4 − 55.8 = −3.4
Each line is arithmetic over the figures on this page.
[03]Reconciliation
Verified- Candidate votesΣ 11 candidate lines1,45,930
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- Published totalVotes polled1,45,930
- Checkcandidates = total, NOTA outside itHolds
Candidate votes equal the published total. NOTA is reported alongside it.
Contest resultElection Commission of India, constituency-wise results · Vidhan Sabha 2002 · Uttar Pradesh · retrieval date not recorded in the results database
Candidates11 candidate lines from the same results · reconciliation: Verified
State median turnoutComputed from 403 seats on the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha 2002 board · retrieval date not recorded in the results database