Sohawal
Assembly constituency 121 (SC) · Uttar Pradesh
[01]Result · 2002
#121 · SCAll candidates 11
- 01 Awadhesh PrasadSP43,398 35.4%
- 02 Ramu PriyadarshiBJP35,242 28.7%
- 03 HariramBSP18,316 14.9%
- 04 HubrajINC13,879 11.3%
- 05 Satendra KumarAD6,133 5.0%
- 06 LachhimanIND2,059 1.7%
- 07 Anant PrasadIND1,218 1.0%
- 08 Ram SaranIND730 0.6%
- 09 MigramIND646 0.5%
- 10 OnkarnathSHOSHI630 0.5%
- 11 Chhabi LalIND478 0.4%
Turnout 53.3%
Share of 2,30,327 electors
- Sex ratiofemales per 1,000 males860
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- State median turnoutmedian of 403 seats, 200255.8%
- ReconciliationΣ 11 candidates = 1,22,729Residual 1
Seat history 2002–2022
- 2002
6.6 ppAwadhesh PrasadSamajwadi Party
- 2007
6.7 ppAwadhesh PrasadSamajwadi Party
- 2012
9.4 ppBhagwat Saran GangwarSamajwadi Party
- 2017
18.3 ppKesar SinghBharatiya Janata Party
- 2022
4.0 ppDr. M. P. AryaBharatiya Janata Party
Winning margin in percentage points; bars scaled to the widest, 18.3 pp.
[02]Computed insights
Arithmetic · working shown-
Third-placed BSP polled 18,316 votes, 2.2× the 8,156-vote margin.
18,316 ÷ 8,156 = 2.2 -
The top two polled 64.1% of votes; the other 9 candidates 35.9% between them.
(43,398 + 35,242) ÷ 1,22,730 = 64.1% · 44,089 ÷ 1,22,730 = 35.9% -
Turnout of 53.3% was 2.5 pp below the state's median seat (55.8%).
53.3 − 55.8 = −2.5
Each line is arithmetic over the figures on this page.
[03]Reconciliation
Reconciliation failed- Candidate votesΣ 11 candidate lines1,22,729
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- Published totalVotes polled1,22,730
- Checkneither convention holdsResidual 1
Candidate votes miss the published total by 1, with NOTA counted inside or outside it.
Contest resultElection Commission of India, constituency-wise results · Vidhan Sabha 2002 · Uttar Pradesh · retrieval date not recorded in the results database
Candidates11 candidate lines from the same results · reconciliation: Reconciliation failed
State median turnoutComputed from 403 seats on the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha 2002 board · retrieval date not recorded in the results database