Kadipur
Assembly constituency 112 (SC) · Uttar Pradesh
[01]Result · 2002
#112 · SCAll candidates 11
- 01 Bhagelu RamBSP39,536 26.8%
- 02 Kashi NathBJP33,079 22.4%
- 03 Jairaj GautamINC22,835 15.5%
- 04 SushilaIND14,078 9.5%
- 05 Kanti DeviPMSP12,611 8.5%
- 06 Ram Chandra ChaudharyAD10,186 6.9%
- 07 DurgavatiCPI(M)9,360 6.3%
- 08 Ram TirathIND2,431 1.7%
- 09 Bansh RajIND1,386 0.9%
- 10 Dev Saran BhartiRKP1,176 0.8%
- 11 Gorakh NathIND1,067 0.7%
Turnout 56.0%
Share of 2,63,769 electors
- Sex ratiofemales per 1,000 males849
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- State median turnoutmedian of 403 seats, 200255.8%
- ReconciliationΣ 11 candidates = 1,47,745Verified
Seat history 2002–2022
- 2002
4.4 ppBhagelu RamBahujan Samaj Party
- 2007
1.1 ppBhagelu RamBahujan Samaj Party
- 2012
21.3 ppAshutosh Mourya Urf RajuSamajwadi Party
- 2017
4.7 ppKushagra SagarBharatiya Janata Party
- 2022
0.7 ppAshutosh Maurya Urf RajuSamajwadi Party
Winning margin in percentage points; bars scaled to the widest, 21.3 pp.
[02]Computed insights
Arithmetic · working shown-
Third-placed INC polled 22,835 votes, 3.5× the 6,457-vote margin.
22,835 ÷ 6,457 = 3.5 -
The top two polled 49.1% of votes; the other 9 candidates 50.9% between them.
(39,536 + 33,079) ÷ 1,47,745 = 49.1% · 75,130 ÷ 1,47,745 = 50.9% -
Turnout of 56.0% was 0.2 pp above the state's median seat (55.8%).
56.0 − 55.8 = +0.2
Each line is arithmetic over the figures on this page.
[03]Reconciliation
Verified- Candidate votesΣ 11 candidate lines1,47,745
- NOTAintroduced in 2013Did not exist
- Published totalVotes polled1,47,745
- Checkcandidates = total, NOTA outside itHolds
Candidate votes equal the published total. NOTA is reported alongside it.
Contest resultElection Commission of India, constituency-wise results · Vidhan Sabha 2002 · Uttar Pradesh · retrieval date not recorded in the results database
Candidates11 candidate lines from the same results · reconciliation: Verified
State median turnoutComputed from 403 seats on the Uttar Pradesh Vidhan Sabha 2002 board · retrieval date not recorded in the results database