ZIYA UL ULOOM INTER COLLEGE PAKKA BAAG ROOM-4 PS 391
SHAKIL AHAMAD (Bahujan Samaj Party)
BSPBSP262 votes at this polling station
over RAJESH SINGHAL (bhartiya Janata Party) (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAKIL AHAMAD (Bahujan Samaj Party) | BSP | 262 | 39.82% | |
| 2 | RAJESH SINGHAL (bhartiya Janata Party) | BJP | 224 | 34.04% | |
| 3 | IQBAL MEHMOOD (Samajwadi Party) | SP | 141 | 21.43% | |
| 4 | MOHAMMAD MUSHIR KHAN TARIN (All India Majlis-E- Ittehadul Muslimeen) | AAP | 20 | 3.04% | |
| 5 | NIDA AHMAD (Indian National Congress) | INC | 4 | 0.61% | |
| 6 | IQBAL (Independent) | IND | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | MOHD. KASHIF KHAN (Aam Aadmi Party) | AAP | 2 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | ZAHID (Shiv Sena) | SS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 9 | NOTA | COL 45 | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | ANSHUL (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SABOOR HUSAIN (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 658 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 262 | 39.82% | 1 | 43 | Average |
| BJP | 224 | 34.04% | 2 | 133 | Average |
| SP | 141 | 21.43% | 3 | 304 | Weak |
| AAP | 22 | 3.34% | 4 | 238 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.61% | 5 | 179 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.46% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 347 | Poor |
| SS | 1 | 0.15% | 8 | 165 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 33, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.