ZIYA UL ULOOM INTER COLLEGE PAKKA BAAG ROOM-1 PS 388
SHAKIL AHAMAD (Bahujan Samaj Party)
BSPBSP279 votes at this polling station
over RAJESH SINGHAL (bhartiya Janata Party) (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHAKIL AHAMAD (Bahujan Samaj Party) | BSP | 279 | 39.08% | |
| 2 | RAJESH SINGHAL (bhartiya Janata Party) | BJP | 256 | 35.85% | |
| 3 | IQBAL MEHMOOD (Samajwadi Party) | SP | 163 | 22.83% | |
| 4 | MOHAMMAD MUSHIR KHAN TARIN (All India Majlis-E- Ittehadul Muslimeen) | AAP | 10 | 1.40% | |
| 5 | NOTA | COL 45 | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 6 | AJAY KUMAR (Independent) | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 7 | IQBAL (Independent) | IND | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 8 | MOHD. KASHIF KHAN (Aam Aadmi Party) | AAP | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 9 | ZAHID (Shiv Sena) | SS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | NIDA AHMAD (Indian National Congress) | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ANSHUL (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SABOOR HUSAIN (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 714 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 279 | 39.08% | 1 | 36 | Average |
| BJP | 256 | 35.85% | 2 | 116 | Average |
| SP | 163 | 22.83% | 3 | 291 | Weak |
| AAP | 11 | 1.54% | 4 | 281 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 3 | 0.42% | 5 | 200 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.28% | 6 | 365 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 406 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 407 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 33, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.