KANIYA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL ROOM-4 PS 265
IQBAL MEHMOOD (Samajwadi Party)
SPSP427 votes at this polling station
over MOHAMMAD MUSHIR KHAN TARIN (All India Majlis-E- Ittehadul Muslimeen) (AAP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IQBAL MEHMOOD (Samajwadi Party) | SP | 427 | 74.91% | |
| 2 | MOHAMMAD MUSHIR KHAN TARIN (All India Majlis-E- Ittehadul Muslimeen) | AAP | 83 | 14.56% | |
| 3 | SHAKIL AHAMAD (Bahujan Samaj Party) | BSP | 25 | 4.39% | |
| 4 | RAJESH SINGHAL (bhartiya Janata Party) | BJP | 24 | 4.21% | |
| 5 | NIDA AHMAD (Indian National Congress) | INC | 6 | 1.05% | |
| 6 | IQBAL (Independent) | IND | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 45 | 2 | 0.35% | |
| 8 | ANSHUL (Independent) | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | SABOOR HUSAIN (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | AJAY KUMAR (Independent) | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MOHD. KASHIF KHAN (Aam Aadmi Party) | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ZAHID (Shiv Sena) | SS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 570 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 427 | 74.91% | 1 | 65 | Strong |
| AAP | 83 | 14.56% | 2 | 104 | Weak |
| BSP | 25 | 4.39% | 3 | 321 | Poor |
| BJP | 24 | 4.21% | 4 | 284 | Poor |
| INC | 6 | 1.05% | 5 | 88 | Poor |
| IND | 3 | 0.53% | 6 | 308 | Poor |
| COL 45 | 2 | 0.35% | 7 | 242 | Poor |
| SS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 324 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 33, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.