RE results.election.ltd INDIAN ELECTION RESULTS

Nagaland #1

counted from all 40 published candidate rows
Candidatures40every name on every ballot
Distinct candidates31as the source spells them
Parties14distinct, as published
Years contested131977 to 2024
Largest field5in 2004 and 1999

Every candidature

40 of 40 rows
Year Pos Candidate Party Votes Vote %
2024 1 S Supongmeren JamirWON INC 4,01,951 52.80%
2024 2 Dr Chumben Murry NDPP 3,50,967 46.10%
2024 3 Hayithung Tungoe Lotha IND 6,232 0.80%
2019 1 Tokheho YepthomiWON NDPP 5,00,510 49.70%
2019 2 K L Chishi INC 4,84,166 48.10%
2019 3 Hayithung Tungoe NPP 14,997 1.50%
2019 4 Dr. M M Thromwa Konyak IND 4,620 0.50%
2014 1 Neiphiu RioWON NPF 7,13,372 68.70%
2014 2 K. V. Pusa INC 3,13,147 30.10%
2014 3 Akhei Achumi SPI 9,695 0.90%
2009 1 C.M. ChangWON NPF 8,32,224 70.00%
2009 2 K. Asungba Sangtam INC 3,49,203 29.40%
2009 3 Dr. Rilanthung Odyuo AITC 8,174 0.70%
2004 1 W. WangyuhWON NPF 6,98,128 73.40%
2004 2 K. Asungba Sangtam INC 2,46,109 25.90%
2004 3 Shri. Akhei Achumi JDS 5,149 0.50%
2004 4 Shri. Nyimthungo IND 3,687 0.40%
2004 5 Dr. Rilanthung IND 1,646 0.20%
1999 1 K. Asungba SangtamWON INC 5,16,119 70.80%
1999 2 Shurhozelie IND 1,62,521 22.30%
1999 3 Neikhaho BJP 37,156 5.10%
1999 4 Akhei Achumi LS 5,763 0.80%
1999 5 Roland IND 3,486 0.50%
1998 1 K. Asungba SangtamWON INC 3,44,223 81.80%
1998 2 Akhei Achumi LS 52,785 12.50%
1996 1 ImchalembaWON INC 4,72,102 61.10%
1996 2 Khekiho IND 2,74,699 35.60%
1996 3 Roland IND 10,825 1.40%
1991 1 ImchalembaWON NPC 3,28,015 52.20%
1991 2 Shikiho Sema INC 2,76,161 44.00%
1991 3 Pius Lotha BJP 18,655 3.00%
1989 1 Shikino SamWON INC 3,63,071 59.80%
1989 2 Vizol NPC 2,39,124 39.40%
1984 1 ChingwangWON INC 2,51,101 63.60%
1984 2 Chalie Kevichusa NNDP 1,13,919 28.90%
1984 3 Huskha IND 23,444 5.90%
1980 1 ChingwangWON IND 1,45,969 49.60%
1980 2 Rano M. Shaiza UDF 1,40,210 47.70%
1977 1 Rano M. ShaizaWON UDF 1,24,627 49.80%
1977 2 Hokishe Sema INC 1,16,527 46.60%

Rows are ordered by year, most recent first, then by finishing position as published. Winner rows are tinted; NOTA rows are set apart because NOTA is not a party and is never a candidate.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×