Sheohar #4
Candidatures70every name on every ballot
Distinct candidates63as the source spells them
Parties33distinct, as published
Years contested52004 to 2024
Largest field18in 2019
Every candidature
| Year | Pos | Candidate | Party | Votes | Vote % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1 | Lovely AnandWON | JDU | 4,76,612 | 45.20% |
| 2024 | 2 | Ritu Jaiswal | RJD | 4,47,469 | 42.40% |
| 2024 | 3 | Akhileshwar Shrivaishanv | IND | 29,094 | 2.80% |
| 2024 | 4 | Kanhaiya Kumar | IND | 20,592 | 2.00% |
| 2024 | 5 | Rana Ranjit | AIMEI | 11,979 | 1.10% |
| 2024 | 6 | Sudhir Kumar Singh | VVIP | 9,102 | 0.90% |
| 2024 | 7 | Vijendra Thakur | BSP | 8,888 | 0.80% |
| 2024 | 8 | Upendra Sahani | RJP | 6,338 | 0.60% |
| 2024 | 9 | Mamta Kumari | SP | 5,435 | 0.50% |
| 2024 | 10 | Mohammad Mahtab Alam | SSP | 4,871 | 0.50% |
| 2024 | 11 | Jagdish Prasad | BVP | 2,955 | 0.30% |
| 2024 | 12 | Dilip Kumar Mishra | PBP | 2,099 | 0.20% |
| 2019 | 1 | Rama DeviWON | BJP | 6,08,678 | 60.60% |
| 2019 | 2 | Syed Faisal Ali | RJD | 2,68,318 | 26.70% |
| 2019 | 3 | Kedar Nath Prasad | IND | 18,426 | 1.80% |
| 2019 | 4 | Raj Kumar Parsad | IND | 13,704 | 1.40% |
| 2019 | 5 | Shamim Alam | NCP | 13,269 | 1.30% |
| 2019 | 6 | Mukesh Kumar Jha | BSP | 12,470 | 1.20% |
| 2019 | 7 | Vijay Nandan Paswan | IND | 11,138 | 1.10% |
| 2019 | 8 | Anil Kumar Tiwari | IND | 10,679 | 1.10% |
| 2019 | 9 | Upendra Sahani | RJP | 7,281 | 0.70% |
| 2019 | 10 | Abul Kalam Khan | IND | 6,084 | 0.60% |
| 2019 | 11 | Anil Kumar | JAP | 5,779 | 0.60% |
| 2019 | 12 | Shyam Kumar | RHS | 5,066 | 0.50% |
| 2019 | 13 | Jagdish Prasad | BVP | 4,563 | 0.50% |
| 2019 | 14 | Ram Dayal Prasad | IND | 3,142 | 0.30% |
| 2019 | 15 | Devendra Prasad Singh | AIFB | 2,640 | 0.30% |
| 2019 | 16 | Prabhu Narayan | SS | 2,499 | 0.20% |
| 2019 | 17 | Nabi Hussain | BPP | 1,992 | 0.20% |
| 2019 | 18 | Anand Kumar Maurya | BAP | 1,814 | 0.20% |
| 2014 | 1 | Rama DeviWON | BJP | 3,72,506 | 44.20% |
| 2014 | 2 | Md Anwarul Haque | RJD | 2,36,267 | 28.00% |
| 2014 | 3 | Shahid Ali Khan | JDU | 79,108 | 9.40% |
| 2014 | 4 | Lovely Anand | SP | 46,008 | 5.50% |
| 2014 | 5 | Angesh Kumar | BSP | 26,446 | 3.10% |
| 2014 | 6 | Laxman Paswan | JMM | 18,681 | 2.20% |
| 2014 | 7 | Shivanandan Prasad | IND | 12,161 | 1.40% |
| 2014 | 8 | Shatrughna Sahu | AAP | 8,256 | 1.00% |
| 2014 | 9 | Sanjay Prasad | IND | 8,245 | 1.00% |
| 2014 | 10 | Ramashish Mahto | IND | 5,941 | 0.70% |
| 2014 | 11 | Jata Shankar Aatrey | RVP | 4,641 | 0.60% |
| 2014 | 12 | Jagranath Sahani | SKLP | 4,399 | 0.50% |
| 2014 | 13 | Md Nasruddin Ansari | NLP | 3,072 | 0.40% |
| 2014 | 14 | Ramashankar Singh | AIFB | 2,845 | 0.30% |
| 2014 | 15 | Ram Lobhit Paswan | BMP | 2,648 | 0.30% |
| 2009 | 1 | Rama DeviWON | BJP | 2,33,499 | 40.70% |
| 2009 | 2 | Md. Anwarul Haque | BSP | 1,07,815 | 18.80% |
| 2009 | 3 | Sitaram Singh | RJD | 89,584 | 15.60% |
| 2009 | 4 | Lovely Anand | INC | 81,479 | 14.20% |
| 2009 | 5 | Md. Tanveer Zafar | CPI | 16,864 | 2.90% |
| 2009 | 6 | Sunil Singh | IND | 10,037 | 1.80% |
| 2009 | 7 | Yogendra Ram | IND | 7,350 | 1.30% |
| 2009 | 8 | Rama Ashish Mahto | IND | 5,734 | 1.00% |
| 2009 | 9 | Mohsin | IND | 3,721 | 0.60% |
| 2009 | 10 | Arun Sah | BLPGL | 3,359 | 0.60% |
| 2009 | 11 | Shatrughna Sahu | BJJD | 3,189 | 0.60% |
| 2009 | 12 | Basdeo Sah | IJP | 2,946 | 0.50% |
| 2009 | 13 | Mohammad Firoz Ahamad | IND | 2,616 | 0.50% |
| 2009 | 14 | Chandrika Prasad | IND | 2,296 | 0.40% |
| 2009 | 15 | Ajay Kumar Pandey | IND | 1,780 | 0.30% |
| 2004 | 1 | Anirudh Prasad Alias Sadhu YadavWON | RJD | 3,36,016 | 48.40% |
| 2004 | 2 | Prabhu Dayal Singh | JDU | 1,43,097 | 20.60% |
| 2004 | 3 | Kali Prasad Panday | IND | 1,36,424 | 19.60% |
| 2004 | 4 | Chhathu Sah | BSP | 43,425 | 6.30% |
| 2004 | 5 | Ram Naresh Ram | CPIML | 11,023 | 1.60% |
| 2004 | 6 | Sushma Devi | IND | 7,563 | 1.10% |
| 2004 | 7 | Paras Nath Pathak | SP | 4,694 | 0.70% |
| 2004 | 8 | Monika Tiwari | BED | 4,312 | 0.60% |
| 2004 | 9 | Pramod Kumar Patel | SP | 4,294 | 0.60% |
| 2004 | 10 | Dina Nath Manjhi | IND | 3,644 | 0.50% |
Rows are ordered by year, most recent first, then by finishing position as published. Winner rows are tinted; NOTA rows are set apart because NOTA is not a party and is never a candidate.