KAMLA NEHRU CHANDRA KUMARI JAIN INTER COLLEGE BODHASHRAM TAPAKALA SHUKHAMALPUR NIZAMABAD R.N. 7 PS 358
SAIFURRAHAMAN URF CHHUTTAN BHAI
SPSP296 votes at this polling station
over SHAZIA HASAN (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SAIFURRAHAMAN URF CHHUTTAN BHAI | SP | 296 | 46.03% | |
| 2 | SHAZIA HASAN | BSP | 249 | 38.72% | |
| 3 | MANISH ASIJA | BJP | 92 | 14.31% | |
| 4 | SANDEEP TIWARI | INC | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 5 | RAMDAS MANAV | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 6 | BASEEM | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 7 | NEETU SINGH SISODIYA | AAAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | BABLOO SINGH RATHORE URF GOLDEE | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | BALVEER SINGH SHANKHAWAR | MADP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MOOL CHANDRA | BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | JAYPAL | BSRD | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 643 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 296 | 45.89% | 1 | 120 | Strong |
| BSP | 249 | 38.60% | 2 | 37 | Average |
| BJP | 92 | 14.26% | 3 | 284 | Weak |
| IND | 3 | 0.47% | 4 | 224 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.31% | 5 | 205 | Poor |
| AAAP | 1 | 0.16% | 6 | 213 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 430 | Poor |
| BSCP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 400 | Poor |
| MADP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 399 | Poor |
| BSRD | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 377 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 97, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.