P.V. NAGLA DHAK PS 56
RAKESH BABU
SPSamajwadi Party277 votes at this polling station
over PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH BABU | SP | 277 | 91.12% | |
| 2 | PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR | BJP | 22 | 7.24% | |
| 3 | SMT. YOGESH DIWAKAR | INC | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 4 | SATYENDRA KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 5 | BABLU SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 6 | SATIHS KUMAR KAMAL | BKPP | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | OM PRAKASH | BMP | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | DEEPAK KUMAR | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | NARESH KUMAR | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MANI RATNAM GAUTAM | PPID | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | YATENDRA KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | AMAR SINGH | BSP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 304 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 277 | 90.82% | 1 | 70 | Strong |
| BJP | 22 | 7.21% | 2 | 430 | Poor |
| BKPP | 1 | 0.33% | 5 | 154 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.33% | 6 | 308 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.33% | 7 | 359 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.33% | 3 | 103 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.33% | 4 | 134 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 441 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 228 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 202 | Poor |
| PPID | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 238 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 220 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 95, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.