P.V. BURJ VALE PS 43
RAKESH BABU
SPSamajwadi Party656 votes at this polling station
over PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH BABU | SP | 656 | 87.82% | |
| 2 | PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR | BJP | 80 | 10.71% | |
| 3 | SMT. YOGESH DIWAKAR | INC | 5 | 0.67% | |
| 4 | OM PRAKASH | BMP | 4 | 0.54% | |
| 5 | MANI RATNAM GAUTAM | PPID | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 6 | SATIHS KUMAR KAMAL | BKPP | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 7 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SATYENDRA KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | AMAR SINGH | BSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | YATENDRA KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DEEPAK KUMAR | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NARESH KUMAR | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | BABLU SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 747 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 656 | 87.58% | 1 | 15 | Strong |
| BJP | 80 | 10.68% | 2 | 395 | Weak |
| INC | 5 | 0.67% | 3 | 127 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.53% | 4 | 15 | Poor |
| PPID | 1 | 0.13% | 6 | 109 | Poor |
| BKPP | 1 | 0.13% | 5 | 149 | Poor |
| IND | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 387 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 439 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 238 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 224 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 194 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 210 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 95, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.