P.V. TRILOKPUR PS 365
RAKESH BABU
SPSamajwadi Party553 votes at this polling station
over PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH BABU | SP | 553 | 92.32% | |
| 2 | PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR | BJP | 42 | 7.01% | |
| 3 | YATENDRA KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 4 | SATIHS KUMAR KAMAL | BKPP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 5 | OM PRAKASH | BMP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 6 | SATYENDRA KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 7 | AMAR SINGH | BSP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | DEEPAK KUMAR | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | NARESH KUMAR | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | BABLU SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MANI RATNAM GAUTAM | PPID | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SMT. YOGESH DIWAKAR | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 599 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 553 | 92.17% | 1 | 21 | Strong |
| BJP | 42 | 7.00% | 2 | 416 | Poor |
| BKPP | 1 | 0.17% | 4 | 258 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.17% | 5 | 374 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.17% | 3 | 217 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.17% | 6 | 150 | Poor |
| BSP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 455 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 412 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 416 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 400 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 445 | Poor |
| PPID | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 412 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 95, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.