P.V. NAGLA KOOM PS 358
AMAR SINGH
BSPBahujan Samaj Party394 votes at this polling station
over RAKESH BABU (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMAR SINGH | BSP | 394 | 90.99% | |
| 2 | RAKESH BABU | SP | 28 | 6.47% | |
| 3 | PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR | BJP | 4 | 0.92% | |
| 4 | SMT. YOGESH DIWAKAR | INC | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 5 | NARESH KUMAR | ASPKR | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 6 | BABLU SINGH | AAP | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | SATYENDRA KUMAR | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | MANI RATNAM GAUTAM | PPID | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | YATENDRA KUMAR | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SATIHS KUMAR KAMAL | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | OM PRAKASH | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | DEEPAK KUMAR | AJP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 433 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 394 | 89.75% | 1 | 13 | Strong |
| SP | 28 | 6.38% | 2 | 421 | Poor |
| BJP | 4 | 0.91% | 3 | 450 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 335 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.46% | 4 | 79 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 2 | 0.46% | 5 | 63 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 372 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 403 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 395 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 405 | Poor |
| PPID | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 407 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 426 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 95, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.