P.V. SHANKARPUR PS 292
RAKESH BABU
SPSamajwadi Party260 votes at this polling station
over AMAR SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAKESH BABU | SP | 260 | 40.12% | |
| 2 | AMAR SINGH | BSP | 222 | 34.26% | |
| 3 | PREM PAL SINGH DHANGAR | BJP | 158 | 24.38% | |
| 4 | OM PRAKASH | BMP | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 5 | SMT. YOGESH DIWAKAR | INC | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 6 | YATENDRA KUMAR | VIP | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 7 | SATYENDRA KUMAR | IND | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 8 | SATIHS KUMAR KAMAL | BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ANIL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DEEPAK KUMAR | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | NARESH KUMAR | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | BABLU SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MANI RATNAM GAUTAM | PPID | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 648 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 260 | 40.06% | 1 | 77 | Strong |
| BSP | 222 | 34.21% | 2 | 52 | Average |
| BJP | 158 | 24.35% | 3 | 339 | Weak |
| BMP | 4 | 0.62% | 4 | 27 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.31% | 5 | 316 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.15% | 6 | 362 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.15% | 7 | 134 | Poor |
| PPID | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 371 | Poor |
| BKPP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 401 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 364 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 375 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 357 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 95, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.