Polling station 379 PS 379

AC 91 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

Mk0 eqds'k dqekj jktiwr

INDIndependent

405 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

91 11.0 pp

votes

over ckcwyky (IND)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electorsnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Total turnoutnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Turnout %not recorded this station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Male electorsnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Female electorsnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Vote share in this booth

of 828 votes counted

IND 48.9% IND 37.9% IND 9.5% NOTA 1.4% IND 0.7% IND 0.5% IND 0.4% IND 0.2% IND 0.2% IND 0.1%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	Mk0 eqds'k dqekj jktiwr	IND	405	48.91%
2	ckcwyky	IND	314	37.92%
3	c`ts'k pkgj	IND	79	9.54%
4	NOTA	NOTA	12	1.45%
5	ys[kjkt	IND	6	0.72%
6	gseUr flag pkgj	IND	4	0.48%
7	lkSjHk ijekj	IND	3	0.36%
8	fguk ukt 'ksjokuh	IND	2	0.24%
9	Mk0 dqejsUnz flag	IND	2	0.24%
10	;ksxsUnz flag pkgj	IND	1	0.12%
11	txnh'k	IND	0	0.00%
12	laxhrk	IND	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 828 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

2 parties · AC 91

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
IND	816	98.55%	1	19	Strong
NOTA	12	1.45%	2	13	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 91, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.