Polling station 370 PS 370

AC 91 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

ckcwyky

INDIndependent

514 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

288 34.7 pp

votes

over c`ts'k pkgj (IND)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electorsnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Total turnoutnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Turnout %not recorded this station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Male electorsnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Female electorsnot recordedthis station has no row in the 2022 booth list

Vote share in this booth

of 829 votes counted

IND 62.0% IND 27.3% IND 8.7% IND 0.6% IND 0.4% IND 0.2% NOTA 0.2% IND 0.2% IND 0.1% IND 0.1% IND 0.1%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	ckcwyky	IND	514	62.00%
2	c`ts'k pkgj	IND	226	27.26%
3	Mk0 eqds'k dqekj jktiwr	IND	72	8.69%
4	gseUr flag pkgj	IND	5	0.60%
5	ys[kjkt	IND	3	0.36%
6	lkSjHk ijekj	IND	2	0.24%
7	NOTA	NOTA	2	0.24%
8	laxhrk	IND	2	0.24%
9	fguk ukt 'ksjokuh	IND	1	0.12%
10	txnh'k	IND	1	0.12%
11	;ksxsUnz flag pkgj	IND	1	0.12%
12	Mk0 dqejsUnz flag	IND	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 829 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

2 parties · AC 91

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
IND	827	99.76%	1	14	Strong
NOTA	2	0.24%	2	294	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 91, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.