dka'khjke ljLorh b0dk0';keuxj xqykcuxj d0u03 PS 80
DR. DHARMPAL SINGH
BJPBJP298 votes at this polling station
over PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 298 | 63.81% | |
| 2 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 143 | 30.62% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 18 | 3.85% | |
| 4 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 4 | 0.86% | |
| 5 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 6 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SATISH | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 467 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 298 | 62.87% | 1 | 236 | Strong |
| BSP | 143 | 30.17% | 2 | 270 | Average |
| SP | 18 | 3.80% | 3 | 379 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.05% | 4 | 187 | Poor |
| BSS | 2 | 0.42% | 5 | 12 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 306 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 158 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 174 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 207 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 212 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.