,l-Mh-xYlZ b-dkWyst] Vs<+h cfx;k d-ua-&2 PS 54
PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH
BSPBSP225 votes at this polling station
over DR. DHARMPAL SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 225 | 43.86% | |
| 2 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 194 | 37.82% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 89 | 17.35% | |
| 4 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 5 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 6 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 7 | SATISH | BMP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 513 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 225 | 43.69% | 1 | 175 | Strong |
| BJP | 194 | 37.67% | 2 | 338 | Average |
| SP | 89 | 17.28% | 3 | 127 | Weak |
| IND | 2 | 0.39% | 4 | 355 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.19% | 6 | 297 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.19% | 5 | 30 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 49 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 152 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 199 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 156 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.