t-b-dkW-,REkkniqj d-ua-&2 PS 453
DR. DHARMPAL SINGH
BJPBJP485 votes at this polling station
over PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 485 | 81.24% | |
| 2 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 59 | 9.88% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 42 | 7.04% | |
| 4 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 5 | SATISH | BMP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 6 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | MAHAVEER | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 597 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 485 | 80.56% | 1 | 73 | Strong |
| BSP | 59 | 9.80% | 2 | 386 | Poor |
| SP | 42 | 6.98% | 3 | 259 | Poor |
| IND | 4 | 0.66% | 4 | 275 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.50% | 6 | 180 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.50% | 5 | 9 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 99 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 461 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 459 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 466 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.