izk-fo--twjSyk d0ua0&1 PS 29
PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH
BSPBSP431 votes at this polling station
over DR. DHARMPAL SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 431 | 95.99% | |
| 2 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 9 | 2.00% | |
| 3 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 5 | 1.11% | |
| 4 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 5 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 6 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SATISH | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 449 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 431 | 95.78% | 1 | 49 | Strong |
| BJP | 9 | 2.00% | 2 | 501 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 1.11% | 3 | 180 | Poor |
| SP | 3 | 0.67% | 4 | 479 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.22% | 5 | 290 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 180 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 135 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 177 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 119 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 133 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.