izk-fo--usdiqj d0ua0&1 PS 27
PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH
BSPBSP462 votes at this polling station
over DR. DHARMPAL SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 462 | 82.50% | |
| 2 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 72 | 12.86% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 18 | 3.21% | |
| 4 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 5 | 0.89% | |
| 5 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 6 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 7 | SATISH | BMP | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 560 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 462 | 82.35% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| BJP | 72 | 12.83% | 2 | 445 | Weak |
| SP | 18 | 3.21% | 3 | 376 | Poor |
| IND | 6 | 1.07% | 4 | 136 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.18% | 6 | 35 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.18% | 5 | 25 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 131 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 407 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 175 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 178 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.