izk-fo-okl eksgu lgk; d0u0 2 PS 246
DR. DHARMPAL SINGH
BJPBJP266 votes at this polling station
over PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 266 | 60.73% | |
| 2 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 134 | 30.59% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 34 | 7.76% | |
| 4 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 5 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 6 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SATISH | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 438 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 266 | 60.18% | 1 | 275 | Strong |
| BSP | 134 | 30.32% | 2 | 281 | Average |
| SP | 34 | 7.69% | 3 | 290 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.45% | 4 | 230 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.45% | 5 | 382 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 286 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 306 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 291 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 280 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 292 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.