dsyk ck-fo-efUnj jkeuxj [kankSyh d-ua-&1 PS 21
PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH
BSPBSP397 votes at this polling station
over DR. DHARMPAL SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 397 | 58.47% | |
| 2 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 176 | 25.92% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 102 | 15.02% | |
| 4 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 5 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 6 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SATISH | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 679 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 397 | 58.13% | 1 | 58 | Strong |
| BJP | 176 | 25.77% | 2 | 352 | Average |
| SP | 102 | 14.93% | 3 | 116 | Weak |
| IND | 3 | 0.44% | 4 | 291 | Poor |
| BSS | 1 | 0.15% | 5 | 29 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 403 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 113 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 130 | Poor |
| RVP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 170 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 172 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.