tkgjohj xksaxkth baa0dk0 izdk'k uxj d0ua0&5 PS 196
DR. DHARMPAL SINGH
BJPBJP278 votes at this polling station
over PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DR. DHARMPAL SINGH | BJP | 278 | 52.06% | |
| 2 | PRAVAL PRATAP SINGH | BSP | 162 | 30.34% | |
| 3 | DR.VIRENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN | SP | 75 | 14.04% | |
| 4 | SHIVANIDEVI DEVI | INC | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 5 | SATISH | BMP | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | SHAILENDRAPAL SINGH | IND | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | SHIVCHARAN LAL | IND | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | DR. ANIL KUMAR SINGH | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | RVP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | SUMIT SINGH | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | VINOD SINGH | PP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KAPIL GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | MAHAVEER | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SUNIL OJHA | BSS | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 534 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 278 | 51.20% | 1 | 256 | Strong |
| BSP | 162 | 29.83% | 2 | 243 | Average |
| SP | 75 | 13.81% | 3 | 144 | Weak |
| IND | 9 | 1.66% | 4 | 73 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.74% | 6 | 104 | Poor |
| BMP | 4 | 0.74% | 5 | 6 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 108 | Poor |
| RVP | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 91 | Poor |
| PP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 253 | Poor |
| BSS | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 261 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 86, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.