जहरा जूनियर हाई स्कूल क0न0 2 PS 82
K.K. Sharma
COL 1818320 votes at this polling station
over Sanjay Kumar sharma (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 320 | 46.72% | |
| 2 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 310 | 45.26% | |
| 3 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 20 | 2.92% | |
| 4 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 13 | 1.90% | |
| 5 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 5 | 0.73% | |
| 6 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 7 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 8 | Anita | COL 24 | 4 | 0.58% | |
| 9 | NOTA | COL 42 | 3 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 2 | 0.29% | |
| 11 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Sakir | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 685 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 320 | 46.72% | 1 | 40 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 310 | 45.26% | 2 | 167 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 20 | 2.92% | 3 | 339 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 17 | 2.48% | 4 | 17 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 5 | 0.73% | 5 | 357 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 4 | 0.58% | 6 | 63 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 4 | 0.58% | 7 | 62 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 3 | 0.44% | 8 | 162 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 2 | 0.29% | 9 | 123 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 248 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 252 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.