उ0प्रा0वि0 (1-8 कम्पोजिट) लौहरका PS 46
Sanjay Kumar sharma
COL 2121262 votes at this polling station
over Rameshvar (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 262 | 56.59% | |
| 2 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 96 | 20.73% | |
| 3 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 70 | 15.12% | |
| 4 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 26 | 5.62% | |
| 5 | NOTA | COL 42 | 5 | 1.08% | |
| 6 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | Anita | COL 24 | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 8 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 9 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Sakir | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 463 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 262 | 56.59% | 1 | 226 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 96 | 20.73% | 2 | 186 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 70 | 15.12% | 3 | 171 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 26 | 5.62% | 4 | 144 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 5 | 1.08% | 5 | 67 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 2 | 0.43% | 6 | 148 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.22% | 7 | 256 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.22% | 8 | 192 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 225 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 237 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 403 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.