पारली प्राईमरी स्कूल क0न0 1 PS 353
Sanjay Kumar sharma
COL 2121157 votes at this polling station
over Rameshvar (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 157 | 49.68% | |
| 2 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 143 | 45.25% | |
| 3 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 10 | 3.16% | |
| 4 | Anita | COL 24 | 3 | 0.95% | |
| 5 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 2 | 0.63% | |
| 6 | NOTA | COL 42 | 1 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Sakir | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 316 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 157 | 49.68% | 1 | 330 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 143 | 45.25% | 2 | 122 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 10 | 3.16% | 3 | 281 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 3 | 0.95% | 4 | 138 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 2 | 0.63% | 5 | 322 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.32% | 6 | 368 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 414 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 449 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 398 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 402 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 428 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.