डरौरा इण्टर कॉलिज क0न0 1 PS 311
Sanjay Kumar sharma
COL 2121235 votes at this polling station
over K.K. Sharma (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 235 | 47.09% | |
| 2 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 173 | 34.67% | |
| 3 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 51 | 10.22% | |
| 4 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 15 | 3.01% | |
| 5 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 9 | 1.80% | |
| 6 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 7 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | NOTA | COL 42 | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | Sakir | COL 30 | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | Anita | COL 24 | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 499 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 235 | 47.09% | 1 | 263 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 173 | 34.67% | 2 | 91 | Average |
| COL 12 | 51 | 10.22% | 3 | 80 | Weak |
| COL 33 | 15 | 3.01% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 9 | 1.80% | 5 | 394 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 8 | 1.60% | 6 | 70 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 3 | 0.60% | 7 | 198 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 2 | 0.40% | 9 | 80 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 2 | 0.40% | 8 | 216 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 264 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 371 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.