3 PS 2
NOTA
COL 424243 votes at this polling station
over Hukam Singh (COL 39)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NOTA | COL 42 | 43 | 12.46% | |
| 2 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 40 | 11.59% | |
| 3 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 37 | 10.72% | |
| 4 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 37 | 10.72% | |
| 5 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 34 | 9.86% | |
| 6 | Sakir | COL 30 | 31 | 8.99% | |
| 7 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 28 | 8.12% | |
| 8 | Anita | COL 24 | 25 | 7.25% | |
| 9 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 22 | 6.38% | |
| 10 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 19 | 5.51% | |
| 11 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 16 | 4.64% | |
| 12 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 13 | 3.77% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 345 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 36 | 74 | 925.00% | 1 | 2 | Strong |
| COL 42 | 43 | 537.50% | 2 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 39 | 40 | 500.00% | 3 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 33 | 34 | 425.00% | 4 | 3 | Strong |
| COL 30 | 31 | 387.50% | 5 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 27 | 28 | 350.00% | 6 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 24 | 25 | 312.50% | 7 | 6 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 22 | 275.00% | 8 | 428 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 19 | 237.50% | 9 | 293 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 16 | 200.00% | 10 | 353 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 13 | 162.50% | 11 | 238 | Strong |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.