जुगसाना खुर्द प्राईमरी स्कूल PS 186
Sanjay Kumar sharma
COL 2121193 votes at this polling station
over K.K. Sharma (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 193 | 63.07% | |
| 2 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 73 | 23.86% | |
| 3 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 26 | 8.50% | |
| 4 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 9 | 2.94% | |
| 5 | Sakir | COL 30 | 3 | 0.98% | |
| 6 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 7 | NOTA | COL 42 | 1 | 0.33% | |
| 8 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Anita | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 306 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 21 | 193 | 63.07% | 1 | 298 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 73 | 23.86% | 2 | 166 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 26 | 8.50% | 3 | 145 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 9 | 2.94% | 4 | 392 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 3 | 0.98% | 5 | 34 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.33% | 6 | 263 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.33% | 7 | 337 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 409 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 354 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 392 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 307 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.