उ0प्रा0वि0 (1-8 कम्पोजिट) कलौली कं0नं0 4 PS 137
K.K. Sharma
COL 1818279 votes at this polling station
over Gajendra Singh (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K.K. Sharma | COL 18 | 279 | 63.41% | |
| 2 | Gajendra Singh | COL 12 | 104 | 23.64% | |
| 3 | Rameshvar | COL 15 | 39 | 8.86% | |
| 4 | Sanjay Kumar sharma | COL 21 | 12 | 2.73% | |
| 5 | Satendra Singh | COL 36 | 3 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | NOTA | COL 42 | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 7 | Harendra Singh | COL 33 | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | Bhupendra Singh | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Anita | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Rashmi | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Sakir | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Hukam Singh | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 440 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 279 | 63.41% | 1 | 53 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 104 | 23.64% | 2 | 26 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 39 | 8.86% | 3 | 273 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 12 | 2.73% | 4 | 437 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.68% | 5 | 225 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.45% | 6 | 235 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 252 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 338 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 381 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 279 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 287 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 67, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.