KAITHRA PRIMARY SCHOOL PS 422
Mohammad Yunus
COL 1818602 votes at this polling station
over Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mohammad Yunus | COL 18 | 602 | 74.88% | |
| 2 | Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary | COL 12 | 131 | 16.29% | |
| 3 | Mohd. Mobin Kallu Qureshi | COL 15 | 65 | 8.08% | |
| 4 | Sushil Chaudhry | COL 21 | 4 | 0.50% | |
| 5 | Gita Rani Sharma | COL 33 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 6 | Mukesh Bhardwaj | COL 36 | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 7 | Satish | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | Sonali Singh | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Tariq Khan | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Madhu Bhati | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Vikas Sharma | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 804 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 602 | 74.60% | 1 | 30 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 131 | 16.23% | 2 | 321 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 65 | 8.05% | 3 | 130 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 4 | 0.50% | 4 | 273 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.12% | 5 | 145 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.12% | 6 | 117 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 441 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 440 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 437 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 433 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 441 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 65, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.