RIJHODA PRIMARY SCHOOL R.NO. 1 PS 371
Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary
COL 1212438 votes at this polling station
over Mohammad Yunus (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary | COL 12 | 438 | 75.00% | |
| 2 | Mohammad Yunus | COL 18 | 77 | 13.18% | |
| 3 | Mohd. Mobin Kallu Qureshi | COL 15 | 54 | 9.25% | |
| 4 | Gita Rani Sharma | COL 33 | 5 | 0.86% | |
| 5 | Sonali Singh | COL 42 | 4 | 0.68% | |
| 6 | Sushil Chaudhry | COL 21 | 3 | 0.51% | |
| 7 | Vikas Sharma | COL 30 | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | Madhu Bhati | COL 27 | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | Mukesh Bhardwaj | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Satish | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Tariq Khan | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 584 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 438 | 74.11% | 1 | 108 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 77 | 13.03% | 2 | 291 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 54 | 9.14% | 3 | 145 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 5 | 0.85% | 4 | 3 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 4 | 0.68% | 5 | 18 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 3 | 0.51% | 6 | 320 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 204 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 115 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 401 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 425 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 407 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 65, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.