SALAWATNAGAR GANGAWALI PRIMARY SCHOOL R.NO-2 PS 3
Mohammad Yunus
COL 1818379 votes at this polling station
over Sushil Chaudhry (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mohammad Yunus | COL 18 | 379 | 96.93% | |
| 2 | Sushil Chaudhry | COL 21 | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 3 | Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary | COL 12 | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 4 | Satish | COL 39 | 3 | 0.77% | |
| 5 | Mukesh Bhardwaj | COL 36 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 6 | Mohd. Mobin Kallu Qureshi | COL 15 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 7 | Vikas Sharma | COL 30 | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 8 | Gita Rani Sharma | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Tariq Khan | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Madhu Bhati | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Sonali Singh | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 391 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 379 | 96.68% | 1 | 122 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 3 | 0.77% | 3 | 276 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 3 | 0.77% | 2 | 446 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 3 | 0.77% | 4 | 45 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.26% | 7 | 28 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 1 | 0.26% | 5 | 403 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.26% | 6 | 218 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 157 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 159 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 138 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 207 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 65, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.