AKBARPUR PRIMARY SCHOOL R.N. 1 PS 144
Mohammad Yunus
COL 1818591 votes at this polling station
over Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mohammad Yunus | COL 18 | 591 | 77.05% | |
| 2 | Pradeep Kumar Chaudhary | COL 12 | 150 | 19.56% | |
| 3 | Sushil Chaudhry | COL 21 | 16 | 2.09% | |
| 4 | Satish | COL 39 | 4 | 0.52% | |
| 5 | Mohd. Mobin Kallu Qureshi | COL 15 | 2 | 0.26% | |
| 6 | Madhu Bhati | COL 27 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 7 | Vikas Sharma | COL 30 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 8 | Gita Rani Sharma | COL 33 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 9 | Sonali Singh | COL 42 | 1 | 0.13% | |
| 10 | Mukesh Bhardwaj | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Tariq Khan | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 767 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 591 | 76.95% | 1 | 34 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 150 | 19.53% | 2 | 309 | Weak |
| COL 21 | 16 | 2.08% | 3 | 25 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 4 | 0.52% | 4 | 33 | Poor |
| COL 15 | 2 | 0.26% | 5 | 383 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.13% | 6 | 59 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.13% | 7 | 267 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.13% | 8 | 85 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.13% | 9 | 131 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 229 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 259 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 65, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.