xqykoBh Mh-,u-fMxzh dkfyt if'peh Hkkx d-u&2 PS 81
Rahul Yadav
COL 1515323 votes at this polling station
over Lakshmi Raj (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 323 | 66.87% | |
| 2 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 83 | 17.18% | |
| 3 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 50 | 10.35% | |
| 4 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 15 | 3.11% | |
| 5 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 9 | 1.86% | |
| 6 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | Bablu | COL 42 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 483 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 323 | 66.60% | 1 | 123 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 83 | 17.11% | 2 | 362 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 50 | 10.31% | 3 | 211 | Weak |
| COL 36 | 15 | 3.09% | 4 | 35 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 9 | 1.86% | 5 | 48 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.21% | 7 | 328 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 170 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.21% | 6 | 26 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 205 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 261 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 248 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.