xqykoBh Mh-,u-b- dkfyt iqjkuk Hkou iwohZ Hkkx d-u&2 PS 71
Lakshmi Raj
COL 1818350 votes at this polling station
over Rahul Yadav (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 350 | 57.85% | |
| 2 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 210 | 34.71% | |
| 3 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 29 | 4.79% | |
| 4 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 10 | 1.65% | |
| 5 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 6 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 7 | Bablu | COL 42 | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 605 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 350 | 57.85% | 1 | 152 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 210 | 34.71% | 2 | 176 | Average |
| COL 12 | 29 | 4.79% | 3 | 261 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 10 | 1.65% | 4 | 54 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 3 | 0.50% | 5 | 227 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 323 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 165 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.17% | 6 | 107 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 240 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 162 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 200 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.