>k>j rkjk pUnz prqosZnh b.Vj dkfyt d0ua0&2 PS 395
Rahul Yadav
COL 1515280 votes at this polling station
over Lakshmi Raj (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 280 | 42.81% | |
| 2 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 280 | 42.81% | |
| 3 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 71 | 10.86% | |
| 4 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 9 | 1.38% | |
| 5 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 5 | 0.76% | |
| 6 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | Bablu | COL 42 | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 10 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 1 | 0.15% | |
| 11 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 654 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 280 | 42.49% | 1 | 139 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 280 | 42.49% | 2 | 219 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 71 | 10.77% | 3 | 175 | Weak |
| COL 36 | 9 | 1.37% | 4 | 61 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 5 | 0.76% | 5 | 162 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 2 | 0.30% | 7 | 289 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 2 | 0.30% | 8 | 125 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 2 | 0.30% | 6 | 89 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.15% | 9 | 182 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.15% | 10 | 92 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.15% | 11 | 131 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.