ljk; ?kklh e?kkuUn bUVj dkfyt d-ua&2 PS 346
Rahul Yadav
COL 1515293 votes at this polling station
over Manveer Singh (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 293 | 47.33% | |
| 2 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 177 | 28.59% | |
| 3 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 137 | 22.13% | |
| 4 | Bablu | COL 42 | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 5 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 3 | 0.48% | |
| 6 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 2 | 0.32% | |
| 7 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 8 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 619 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 293 | 46.81% | 1 | 134 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 177 | 28.27% | 2 | 81 | Average |
| COL 18 | 137 | 21.88% | 3 | 324 | Weak |
| COL 42 | 4 | 0.64% | 4 | 27 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 3 | 0.48% | 5 | 189 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 2 | 0.32% | 6 | 30 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 248 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 1 | 0.16% | 7 | 416 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 170 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 374 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 404 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.