n;korh nhoku flag 'kqDy ljLorh fo|k efUnj b.Vj dkfyt d-ua-&2 PS 307
Rahul Yadav
COL 1515473 votes at this polling station
over Dilshad Ahmad (COL 36)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 473 | 84.46% | |
| 2 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 27 | 4.82% | |
| 3 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 26 | 4.64% | |
| 4 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 19 | 3.39% | |
| 5 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 12 | 2.14% | |
| 6 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 7 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 8 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Bablu | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 560 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 473 | 84.16% | 1 | 59 | Strong |
| COL 36 | 27 | 4.80% | 2 | 12 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 26 | 4.63% | 3 | 269 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 19 | 3.38% | 4 | 13 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 12 | 2.14% | 5 | 449 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 2 | 0.36% | 6 | 270 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.18% | 7 | 158 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 345 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 366 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 387 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 410 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.