dkdk xYlZ fMxzh dkfyt fldUnzkckn d-ua-&1 PS 272
Rahul Yadav
COL 1515197 votes at this polling station
over Lakshmi Raj (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 197 | 37.74% | |
| 2 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 184 | 35.25% | |
| 3 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 124 | 23.75% | |
| 4 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 6 | 1.15% | |
| 5 | Bablu | COL 42 | 4 | 0.77% | |
| 6 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 8 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 522 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 197 | 37.38% | 1 | 184 | Average |
| COL 18 | 184 | 34.91% | 2 | 285 | Average |
| COL 12 | 124 | 23.53% | 3 | 116 | Weak |
| COL 21 | 6 | 1.14% | 4 | 106 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 4 | 0.76% | 5 | 26 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.57% | 6 | 110 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 3 | 0.57% | 7 | 181 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 152 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 317 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 343 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 365 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.