fldUnzkckn ts0,l0fMxzh dkfyt mRrjh Hkkx d-ua&2 PS 234
Manveer Singh
COL 1212365 votes at this polling station
over Lakshmi Raj (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manveer Singh | COL 12 | 365 | 50.69% | |
| 2 | Lakshmi Raj | COL 18 | 253 | 35.14% | |
| 3 | Rahul Yadav | COL 15 | 80 | 11.11% | |
| 4 | Raju Thakur | COL 39 | 7 | 0.97% | |
| 5 | Dilshad Ahmad | COL 36 | 5 | 0.69% | |
| 6 | Darshan Sharma | COL 33 | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 7 | Saleem Akhtar Khan | COL 21 | 3 | 0.42% | |
| 8 | Amit Singh Tomar | COL 30 | 2 | 0.28% | |
| 9 | Ajay Kumar | COL 24 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 10 | Bablu | COL 42 | 1 | 0.14% | |
| 11 | Ajay Kumar Sharma | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 720 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 365 | 50.41% | 1 | 21 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 253 | 34.94% | 2 | 244 | Average |
| COL 15 | 80 | 11.05% | 3 | 294 | Weak |
| COL 39 | 7 | 0.97% | 4 | 32 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 5 | 0.69% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 3 | 0.41% | 7 | 38 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 3 | 0.41% | 6 | 252 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 2 | 0.28% | 8 | 22 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.14% | 9 | 144 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.14% | 10 | 217 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 290 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 64, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.