SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ADARSH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, SURAJPUR R. N. 05 PS 525
Candidate Name TEJPAL SINGH NAGAR
COL 00373 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name RAJKUMAR BHATI (COL 0)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name TEJPAL SINGH NAGAR | COL 0 | 373 | 77.23% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name RAJKUMAR BHATI | COL 0 | 94 | 19.46% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name MANBIR SINGH | COL 0 | 10 | 2.07% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name DEEPAK KUMAR BHATI CHOTIWALA | COL 0 | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name ANNU KHAN | COL 0 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name TRILOCHAN NARAYAN SINGH | COL 0 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name RAGHWENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA | COL 0 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name SANJAY | COL 0 | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name VINAY NAGAR | COL 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Candidate Name CHAMAN SINGH | COL 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Candidate Name JAGDISH SINGH | COL 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | Candidate Name SANJAY KUMAR SHARMA | COL 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | Candidate Name AMIT BASOYA | COL 0 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | Candidate Name HEMANT SHARMA | COL 0 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 483 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 0 | 483 | 99.79% | 1 | 425 | Strong |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 62, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.