HINDU KANYA INTER COLLEGE PILKHUWA KAMRA NO 1 PS 83

AC 58 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR

BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

410 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

125 17.6 pp

votes

over AAASLAM ALI (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,148

Total turnout714votes cast at this station

Turnout %62.2% of this booth's roll

Male electors392

Female electors322

Vote share in this booth

of 709 votes counted

BJP 57.8% SP 40.2% INCP 0.7% BSP 0.3% AIMEI 0.3% AAP 0.3% IND 0.1% SJP 0.1% IND 0.1%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR	BJP	410	57.83%
2	AAASLAM ALI	SP	285	40.20%
3	ARVIND SHARMA	INCP	5	0.71%
4	BASID	BSP	2	0.28%
5	ARIF	AIMEI	2	0.28%
6	C.M. CHAUHAN	AAP	2	0.28%
7	PRAMOD KUMAR	IND	1	0.14%
8	BRIJESH KORI	SJP	1	0.14%
9	ASAMA	IND	1	0.14%
10	KEERTY PRATAP SINGH	IND	0	0.00%
11	KULDEEP	IND	0	0.00%
12	TRIVEDI	NCP	0	0.00%
13	NAZIM	JAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 709 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 58

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	410	57.42%	1	138	Strong
SP	285	39.92%	2	178	Average
INCP	5	0.70%	3	124	Poor
IND	2	0.28%	7	281	Poor
AAP	2	0.28%	4	99	Poor
AIMEI	2	0.28%	5	209	Poor
BSP	2	0.28%	6	402	Poor
SJP	1	0.14%	8	46	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	9	156	Poor
NCP	0	0.00%	10	180	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 58, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.