PRATHMIK VIDHYALAY ACHPALGARHI KAMRA NO 1 PS 71

AC 58 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR

BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

595 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

455 59.0 pp

votes

over AAASLAM ALI (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors966

Total turnout772votes cast at this station

Turnout %79.9% of this booth's roll

Male electors414

Female electors358

Vote share in this booth

of 771 votes counted

BJP 77.2% SP 18.2% BSP 2.6% IND 0.5% AAP 0.4% NCP 0.3% SJP 0.3% IND 0.3% INCP 0.3% IND 0.1%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR	BJP	595	77.17%
2	AAASLAM ALI	SP	140	18.16%
3	BASID	BSP	20	2.59%
4	KULDEEP	IND	4	0.52%
5	C.M. CHAUHAN	AAP	3	0.39%
6	TRIVEDI	NCP	2	0.26%
7	BRIJESH KORI	SJP	2	0.26%
8	KEERTY PRATAP SINGH	IND	2	0.26%
9	ARVIND SHARMA	INCP	2	0.26%
10	PRAMOD KUMAR	IND	1	0.13%
11	ASAMA	IND	0	0.00%
12	NAZIM	JAP	0	0.00%
13	ARIF	AIMEI	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 771 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 58

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	595	77.07%	1	38	Strong
SP	140	18.13%	2	244	Weak
BSP	20	2.59%	3	233	Poor
IND	7	0.91%	4	46	Poor
AAP	3	0.39%	5	53	Poor
NCP	2	0.26%	7	18	Poor
INCP	2	0.26%	6	263	Poor
SJP	2	0.26%	8	10	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	10	146	Poor
AIMEI	0	0.00%	9	330	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 58, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.