PRATHMIK VIDHYALAY ACHCHHEJA KAMRA NO 4 PS 33

AC 58 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR

BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

437 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

230 32.3 pp

votes

over AAASLAM ALI (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,164

Total turnout717votes cast at this station

Turnout %61.6% of this booth's roll

Male electors389

Female electors328

Vote share in this booth

of 713 votes counted

BJP 61.3% SP 29.0% BSP 7.4% INCP 0.8% AAP 0.4% SJP 0.3% AIMEI 0.3% NCP 0.1% IND 0.1% IND 0.1%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR	BJP	437	61.29%
2	AAASLAM ALI	SP	207	29.03%
3	BASID	BSP	53	7.43%
4	ARVIND SHARMA	INCP	6	0.84%
5	C.M. CHAUHAN	AAP	3	0.42%
6	BRIJESH KORI	SJP	2	0.28%
7	ARIF	AIMEI	2	0.28%
8	TRIVEDI	NCP	1	0.14%
9	KEERTY PRATAP SINGH	IND	1	0.14%
10	PRAMOD KUMAR	IND	1	0.14%
11	KULDEEP	IND	0	0.00%
12	NAZIM	JAP	0	0.00%
13	ASAMA	IND	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 713 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 58

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	437	60.95%	1	122	Strong
SP	207	28.87%	2	207	Average
BSP	53	7.39%	3	172	Poor
INCP	6	0.84%	4	96	Poor
AAP	3	0.42%	5	48	Poor
AIMEI	2	0.28%	6	199	Poor
IND	2	0.28%	7	276	Poor
SJP	2	0.28%	8	8	Poor
NCP	1	0.14%	9	46	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	10	122	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 58, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.