PRATHMIK VIDHYALAY DHAULANA NO 2 KAMRA NO 2 PS 260

AC 58 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR

BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

326 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

109 16.8 pp

votes

over BASID (BSP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors972

Total turnout654votes cast at this station

Turnout %67.3% of this booth's roll

Male electors346

Female electors308

Vote share in this booth

of 650 votes counted

BJP 50.2% BSP 33.4% SP 14.0% INCP 0.5% AIMEI 0.5% IND 0.5% IND 0.5% SJP 0.3% AAP 0.2% IND 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR	BJP	326	50.15%
2	BASID	BSP	217	33.38%
3	AAASLAM ALI	SP	91	14.00%
4	ARVIND SHARMA	INCP	3	0.46%
5	ARIF	AIMEI	3	0.46%
6	KULDEEP	IND	3	0.46%
7	PRAMOD KUMAR	IND	3	0.46%
8	BRIJESH KORI	SJP	2	0.31%
9	C.M. CHAUHAN	AAP	1	0.15%
10	KEERTY PRATAP SINGH	IND	1	0.15%
11	TRIVEDI	NCP	0	0.00%
12	NAZIM	JAP	0	0.00%
13	ASAMA	IND	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 650 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 58

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	326	49.85%	1	193	Strong
BSP	217	33.18%	2	47	Average
SP	91	13.91%	3	287	Weak
IND	7	1.07%	4	55	Poor
INCP	3	0.46%	6	236	Poor
AIMEI	3	0.46%	5	186	Poor
SJP	2	0.31%	7	14	Poor
AAP	1	0.15%	8	195	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	9	296	Poor
NCP	0	0.00%	10	304	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 58, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.