PRATHMIK VIDHYALAY DAULATPUR DHEEKRI KAMRA NO 1 PS 252

AC 58 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR

BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY

438 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

313 53.9 pp

votes

over AAASLAM ALI (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors755

Total turnout582votes cast at this station

Turnout %77.1% of this booth's roll

Male electors327

Female electors255

Vote share in this booth

of 581 votes counted

BJP 75.4% SP 21.5% BSP 1.0% AIMEI 0.7% INCP 0.3% NCP 0.3% IND 0.3% IND 0.2% SJP 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

13 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	DHARMESH SINGH TOMAR	BJP	438	75.39%
2	AAASLAM ALI	SP	125	21.51%
3	BASID	BSP	6	1.03%
4	ARIF	AIMEI	4	0.69%
5	ARVIND SHARMA	INCP	2	0.34%
6	TRIVEDI	NCP	2	0.34%
7	KULDEEP	IND	2	0.34%
8	PRAMOD KUMAR	IND	1	0.17%
9	BRIJESH KORI	SJP	1	0.17%
10	ASAMA	IND	0	0.00%
11	KEERTY PRATAP SINGH	IND	0	0.00%
12	NAZIM	JAP	0	0.00%
13	C.M. CHAUHAN	AAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 581 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 58

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	438	75.26%	1	121	Strong
SP	125	21.48%	2	258	Weak
BSP	6	1.03%	3	338	Poor
AIMEI	4	0.69%	4	160	Poor
IND	3	0.52%	5	247	Poor
INCP	2	0.34%	6	291	Poor
NCP	2	0.34%	7	27	Poor
SJP	1	0.17%	8	87	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	9	352	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	10	289	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 58, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.